|
»
Gender & the Brain » Career
Aspirations
What the Research
Shows The Benefits of
Attending a Girls' School
"The students I met are learning to
be their best selves, competent and comfortable with who
they are. Isn't that what all children
deserve?" -- Karen Stabiner, author, "All
Girls: Single-Sex Education and Why It Matters"
Picture a classroom. It doesn't matter what subject,
or what grade level. Imagine the teacher asks a question
of the class... and virtually every hand shoots right up
into the air. Virtually every student is eager to
answer, enthusiastic about learning.
This is a scene played out daily in the classrooms of
NCGS member schools. Girls' school classrooms are places
where education is prized, where teachers feel
empowered, where girls are excited about being in
school.
A Growing Consensus
In 1982, Harvard University researcher Carol
Gilligan authored a book that would go on to
trigger a revolution in education. With In a
Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's
Development, Dr. Gilligan established that girls
think, interact, display leadership and make decisions
in a way that is unique both psychologically and
develop-mentally. The male-based model, she found,
simply did not fit the way girls learn.
Dr. Gilligan's conclusions, as well as a growing
awareness of disparities in academic performance between
girls and boys, led to a closer examination of what
actually goes on in a co-ed classroom. In
Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America, the
American Association of University
Women (AAUW) found that girls routinely were
called upon less often. Professors Myra and
David Sadker echoed those findings in
Failing at Fairness: How Schools Shortchange
Girls, a compendium of 10 years of their research
at American University.
Since then, single-sex education has been the subject
of increasing interest among researchers, and several
major reports have detailed the ways in which all-girl
learning environments can be beneficial. A 2000 study of
4,274 girls' school alumnae, conducted for NCGS by the
Goodman Research Group of Cambridge,
Massachusetts, examined outcomes at single-sex schools
for girls. The girls' school alumnae were overwhelmingly
positive in their responses:
- 91% cited preparation for college and academic
challenge as very good or excellent
- 88% would repeat their girls' school experience
- 83% perceived themselves to be better prepared for
college than female counterparts from co-educational
high schools
- 93% agreed that girls' schools provide greater
leadership opportunities than coed schools;
additionally, 80% had held leadership positions since
graduating from high school
- 13% intended to major in math or science --
significantly more than females and males nationally
(2% and 10% respectively)
Many participants in the Goodman study volunteered
commentary in support of the survey questions; for
example:
- "At the girls' school I attended, academics
and being smart were the focus of most students."
- "I was constantly challenged, stimulated,
exposed to new ideas, encouraged and supported."
- "Because of my girls' school experience, I
developed a strong sense of myself and the confidence
to make important choices in my life."
Researcher Cornelius Riordan, author
of Girls and Boys in School: Together or
Separate?, has spent years examining educational
outcomes based on various school settings. Recently he
summed up his findings in a Boston Globe editorial:
"Having conducted research on single-sex and
co-educational schools for the past two decades, I
have concluded that single-sex schools help to improve
student achievement. My conclusions are based on high
quality national data gathered by the National Center
for Education Statistics, as well as on studies
conducted around the globe."
Many countries overseas have significant student
populations enrolled in single-sex schools, and collect
detailed statistics for comparison purposes. In Great
Britain, the National Foundation for Educational
Research examined student performance data from
979 primary and 2,954 secondary schools. Among its
objectives was to test assertions that single-sex
education can be beneficial for girls and boys alike.
The study concluded that:
- Girls’ schools help counter gender-stereotyping in
subject choices
- Girls in single-sex schools perform better than
girls in co-ed schools, regardless of socio-economic
and ability levels
- Boys with low prior academic achievement score
slightly better on the GCSE (a standardized test
required for graduation) in boys’ schools than in
co-ed schools
- Boys in single-sex grammar schools perform better
than those in co-ed grammar schools
A similar conclusion comes out of Australia, where
Dr. Ken Rowe, Principal Research Fellow
at the Australian Council for Educational Research,
summarized the findings of several studies involving
more than 270,000 students. Dr. Rowe presented the
results of his research to The Second National
Conference on Co-Education, held in Australia in April
of 2000, telling the audience:
"Co-educational settings are limited in their
capacity to accommodate the large differences in
cognitive, social and developmental growth rates of
girls and boys between the ages of 12 and 16. In
contrast... evidence suggests that during these key
adolescent years, single-sex settings better
accommodate the specific developmental needs of
students."
Dr. Rosemary C. Salomone, a
professor at St. John's University School of Law, has
conducted a similar survey of the available research. In
her book Same, Different, Equal: Rethinking Single-Sex
Schooling, Dr. Salomone writes:
"All-girls settings seem to provide girls a
certain comfort level that helps them develop greater
self-confidence and broader interests, especially as
they approach adolescence. Research has found that
single-sex schools and classes promote
less-gender-polarized attitudes toward certain
subjects – math and science in the case of girls and
language arts and foreign languages in the case of
boys."
For generations, girls' schools have served students
of many abilities, interests, talents and backgrounds.
What unites these schools is a long-standing commitment
to learning environments that place girls first and
foremost. What sets them apart from other educational
settings is an in-depth understanding of how girls learn
and succeed.
According to Burch Ford, Head of
Miss Porter's School and former President of the NCGS
Board of Trustees:
"It is important that girls, while they are
still growing physically, emotionally, socially,
intellectually, and spiritually, be served in a
context that encourages and supports their expression,
however tentative and nascent. They need to have the
opportunity, easily available not just hard-won, to
risk self-expression as scholars, athletes, artists,
and leaders, until their competence leads to the
confidence not only to express themselves but also to
comfortably sustain their perspectives when they are
challenged by boys and men. That competence and
confidence does not follow from insight or
understanding alone, but can only develop from example
of adult models, along with personal practice and
experience."
At NCGS member schools, girls enjoy not just equal
opportunity, but every opportunity. All the speakers,
players, writers, singers, athletes, doers, and leaders
are girls. Mentors and role models are not hard to find.
There are no chilly classroom climates to endure, no
subtle signs of second-class citizenship.
Professors Myra and David Sadker,
the American University researchers quoted earlier, put
it this way:
"When girls go to single-sex schools, they stop
being the audience and become the players."
It is a frame of mind that puts girls' school alumnae
at a competitive advantage when entering college.
Robin Robertson, a former girls' school
principal who later taught at the university level, says
girls' school alumnae stand out in a crowd:
"As a college professor I could identify
students from girls' schools with a 90 percent
accuracy rate on the first day of class. They were the
young women whose hands shot up in the air, who were
not afraid to defend their positions, and who assumed
that I would be interested in their perspective."
Single-sex education is gaining new prominence in the
United States today. According to Harvard University
researcher Dr. David Riesman,
"Girls' schools provide an environment that not
only is good in and of itself, but that in its
redefinition of competitiveness and collaboration, of
autonomy and connectedness, presents a model that
other schools do well to emulate."
NCGS member schools are educational leaders, not
followers of trends, and have led the way for
generations. They are incubators of innovation, where
best practices for the teaching of girls draw upon
decades of tradition while embracing the challenges and
seizing the opportunities of the 21st century.
Girls' schools know that students who are held to the
highest expectations, given access to the best
resources, and who are led to understand that serious
schooling is theirs for the taking -- these are students
who do not turn back. This is exactly the culture of a
girls' school, and time spent within one transforms
girls. It is a sound investment for life.
Contents: » What
the Research Shows » Gender
& the Brain: The Difference Is In the Details
»
The Effect of School Setting on Career Aspirations
» 10
Things That Make Girls' Schools Unique
Order printed
brochures: »
What the Research Shows Order Form
Learn more: » Fordham
Law Journal: The Difference in Girl-Centered
Education » Alumnae
Profile: Achievement, Leadership & Success
»
Trends Snapshot
|